StavBureau

The Bureau of Yuri Stavros, visionary communistical puppet leader.

Basic Structure

The Bureau consist of forty two members but only 4.2 votes, this naturally cause some tension. Luckily as the malcontents don’t have a vote they can be safely ignored. At present not all the bureau seats have been filled and the membership is somewhat fluid, this is a deliberate feature to ensure the calibre and type of member can reflect the ever changing needs of the Bureau.

Voting Members

Non-Voting Members

Entities to whom the Bureau extends a permanent invitation

Potential Future Ministries

Former Members

Aims

Electoral Mechanics

Voting System

The system is controversial to say the least but is at least simple; One voting member, one vote. Unless the man is Stav in which case he only gets 0.2 of a vote.

In the event a voting member is absent their vote is reallocated by the Party Chairman in accordance with a strict order of precedence of senior StavBureau members in good standing. If no-one on the order of precedence is present either then the Chairman can reallocate the vote at his own discretion.

Bureau At Large

In the event that the Chairman is absent and there are in-sufficient Senior Non-Voting members present to make up the numbers, it is permissible for decisions to be made by as much of the Bureau as is present. Such ad-hoc groups are referred to as the Bureau at Large and their decisions are unarguable binding law, until such time as the rest of the Bureau finds out. At this point the decisions are null and void until the full Bureau has voted on the matter.

Senior Non-Voting Members in Order of Precedence

Reserve Non-Voting Members in No Particular Order

While both lists are somewhat on the short side the Bureau is distinctly short of senior members in good standing. Indeed even the definition of ‘good standing’ has had to be stretched beyond breaking point to produce the above lists.

Stav Bureau Members in Such Bad Standing as to be Banned from Voting

Recent Triumphs

Lamentably few. Despite the opportunities presented by the recent economic crisis the Bureau has singularly failed to get Stavanomics accepted or even discussed as a realistic alternative to the current system. This is regrettable.